28 February 2018

Posts on a Scientists for EU #FBPE‏ Twitter thread


17522711_10154613243378981_3499746658784883531_n.jpg  Progressive European Party

The following is a not untypical “conversation” with a leave voter


progressive #FBPE‏ @Prog_Party Feb 25
The free movement of people is the EU’s greatest achievement. So why do the brexiteers hate it so much

BUTTS
Yea ... if youre Romanian ...

progressive #FBPE‏ @Prog_Party Feb 26
or if your British

BUTTS Feb 26
Why ? Where could you not go before ? .... unless you were a defector only the eastern bloc , life is so good in those countries guess what ?? ..... theyre all here .... kinda makes your argument look a bit daft doesnt it ?

progressive #FBPE‏ @Prog_Party Feb 27
EU nationals coming here is a win win situation They benefit and we benefit Why do you want to stop something that everyone benefits from?

BUTTS Feb 27
Everything is ok in moderation , when it becomes an invasion & creates resource problems please tell me how we benefit ??

progressive #FBPE‏ @Prog_Party Feb 27
European migrants made a net contribution of £20bn to UK public finances between 2000 and 2011

BUTTS Feb 27
Yeah .... lies , damn lies & statistics ... go & get a doctors appointment or get your child in a school .... among a thousand other things ... ive no doubt there are thousands who benefit both themselves & our economy .. ive also no doubt about the thousands who dont .

progressive #FBPE‏ @Prog_Party 10h10 hours ago
Your blaming those who contribute to our society for the under funding policies of our government Why not blame who is responsible

BUTTS 7h7 hours ago
So they all contribute do they ??? If another 10 people came to live in your house , and it was only built for 5 would that not be a problem ? We dont have the resources to keep the world .. how much do you want the govt to fund , remember .. they dont fund it .. YOU do

progressive #FBPE‏ @Prog_Party 6h6 hours ago
Again your blaming those who come here and contribute to our society instead of blaming the Gov for not building the houses we need Very twisted logic Nothing more than scapegoating

BUTTS 7h7 hours ago
Where do you want to build ?? Which bit of we are full do you not get ?? Lets bring em all here eh !! I will pay ... & pay to send money to their kids, i am blaming the govt .... for not stopping it years ago ....

progressive #FBPE‏ @Prog_Party 4m4 minutes ago
You still don’t get it do you, they are not some poor relative that we have to support The NHS needs them industry needs them the Treasury needs the Tax income we benefit enormously by there coming here to work we will suffer economically and socially if we end the free movement

progressive #FBPE‏ @Prog_Party 4m4 minutes ago
of people with EU and we have plenty of space to build more housing and 2 or 3 new towns and space within existing towns Encourage them to come and let them help turn us into the greatest country in europe instead of the insignificant backwater that brexit will turn us into

BUTTS
Theres no cure for stupid ... you made your case pre referendum , it clearly didnt wash .... the majority spoke and we are leaving , all youre doing is trying to bolt the stable door , sorry the horse went last june .... the quiet masses spoke ..... no more , no thanks ...

BUTTS
You dont get it ..... we dont ..there are millions of people either unemployed or on zero hour contracts , we arent importing brain surgeons here ... its mainly an unskilled labour force , and yes , in the main we are supporting a poor relative , or they wouldnt be here .

progressive #FBPE‏ @Prog_Party 3m3 minutes ago
I never made any case before the referendum I’m not trying to bolt the stable door I’m trying to take over the country We are employing brain surgeons most EU migrants are university educated No cure for the stupid you said it not me

BUTTS
“Most EU migrants are university educate” .... congrats on the most deluded dimwitted quote of the week .... which planet are you living on ?? Youre in cloud cuckoo land ...

progressive #FBPE‏
No I only use facts
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/08/mapped-how-britain-has-the-highest-level-of-skilled-migration-in/

The point of view being put forward is something I have come up against before with face to face discussions that I have had with leavers. The EU nationals that come here are uneducated, they are a drain on our resources, they push wages down take jobs from the locals put a strain on the health service and cause overcrowding in our little Island where we have no more room. And so forth. 
Is it worth getting into discussions with someone who it is clear is never going to change their minds on the subject? I think it is. You never know who else is going to read the discourse and to see both arguments side by side could sway someone who previously voted leave to change sides. There is another post that I have not reproduced here where he says the article I gave in support of my assertion that most EU migrants are university graduates in fact does not say that and I should read it more carefully. This total denial of the truth even when it is there in black and white is typical of the leave arguments. 
We must keep engaging with them otherwise they will only talk to like minded people and we tend to do the same. This is especially important to do on the internet because the potential audience is unlimited and after all whether we stay in or leave we all have to somehow get on with each other after this is all over.


                       Philip Notley             #progEuroparty 

25 February 2018

Will we regain sovereignty by leaving the EU?


17522711_10154613243378981_3499746658784883531_n.jpg  Progressive European Party


Some people claim that we will we regain sovereignty by leaving the EU



Official EU voting records show that the British government has voted ‘No’ to laws passed at EU level on 56 occasions, abstained 70 times, and voted ‘Yes’ 2,466 times since 1999,
In other words, UK ministers were on the “winning side” 95% of the time, abstained 3% of the time, and were on the losing side 2%.



https://fullfact.org/europe/eu-facts-behind-claims-uk-influence/


This hardly qualifies as a loss of sovereignty.


The only country in the world with complete sovereignty is north Korea. For us to have complete sovereignty we would have to leave the WTO NATO and probably the United Nations as well as the EU. 





"Trade deals" would become virtually impossible.


In the EU we have the benefit of being part of a large bloc that has strong bargaining powers. Outside of it we will not be in the same strong position and would therefore have to give more away to get the deals we want.


Outside the EU we will have less sovereignty than we currently have now as members.


Most decisions made by the EU are taken on a majority vote. So we can, on some occasions, be outvoted. This is a small loss of sovereignty but we are nevertheless a part of the decision-making process and can have an influence over the outcomes. By contrast, if we only use WTO rules we have no control over them whatever. We can only trade under the WTO rules as they currently stand.


Outside the EU our biggest trading partner will still be the EU. So we will still have to follow EU standards on any goods that we sell to them. However, we will no longer have any say in what those requirements will be. In other words, we will have far less sovereignty when trading with the EU than we currently have as members.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

When we do deals with countries such as India and Australia they will want to bring their staff over with their businesses without going through UK Home Office bureaucracy. I am sure that Leavers will say that we can just refuse their demands. As we have just thrown our bargaining chips on the fire along with our EU membership, this would be well-nigh impossible.


The Leave campaign was all about the "taking back of control". What this really meant to many people was depriving EU nationals of the right to come here. Many of our future trade deals will also include free movement of people. The only difference will be that in future more people will be coming from outside of the EU.

How is this a regaining of sovereignty?


There are almost one hundred deals that we now have via our EU membership that we will have to renegotiate. It is highly unlikely that we will get as good a deal with any of them as we currently have now. Each new deal could take many years to negotiate and even more sovereignty will be lost.


Advocates of leave seem to have a totally deluded notion of how the world works and of the UK's place in it.


It seems to me that there is no medicine that can fix our national sickness other than a large and unpalatable dose of reality.


It is all very well for politicians who are not in government to make exaggerated claims about how the world will look when we are on the outside of the EU. However, at present, even our "Government" is also doing exactly that. We may have to wait for the proverbial to hit the fan before normality can be restored.


And "Sovereignty" is the biggest turd of all heading straight towards the Brexit fan.

10 February 2018

The free movement of people is the EU’s greatest achievement. So why do the brexiteers hate it so much

17522711_10154613243378981_3499746658784883531_n.jpg  Progressive European Party

The EU has immigration guidelines that all members have to adhere to. However in the case of UK and Ireland
So when the brexiteers say they are not against immigration, they just want to be able to for example bring doctors from India. We already can. What we can’t do is stop a doctor coming here from France, but why would we want to. None of the leave arguments are rational and most of them are lies or at best distortions of the truth.

EU nationals coming here put a strain on the Health service, we are told. When many of them work in the health service and help to keep it running. And they all have to have health insurance in any case.

Seeing as all EU nationals have to have health insurance, and a job or be financially independent, or they can be sent back and seeing as we have the same rights to go there it is hardly something to complain about.

Immigration from the EU is a win win situation. They benefit from coming here, otherwise why would they come. The treasury benefits from the not inconsiderable extra tax revenue. And the whole of our society benefits from the health workers, plumbers, fruit pickers and so forth that we need.




With our ageing population we need more people of working age, do we want to be in the situation of having people in their 70’s driving the buses and working on the building sites. Of course we can replace EU immigration with workers from further afield. But what possible advantage would there be in doing so. In any case, the argument from the brexiteers is always about reducing immigration. Remember the “breaking point” poster.

If immigration was considerably reduced it would be disastrous for us. There always seems to be Government targets to reduce immigration down to some level or other by some arbitrary date. There is never a target for an increase. If we did have an increase of EU workers and business our economy would be doing even better. We get no benefit from a German car manufacturer building a factory in Germany. However, if they built it here even if they only employed German staff we would get a great deal of benefit from it. We are in the ludicrous situation of UK businesses advertising abroad for staff while at the same time our Government is trying to bring down immigration. What do they have for breakfast, it's definitely not Weetabix.



When we leave the EU it is not membership of the single market or the customs union that we most need to retain. No matter how important both of these are for our economy. The one thing we really need to preserve from our EU membership is the free movement of people. The one thing that the Brexit argument was most desperate to stop is the one thing that we need to keep above all else.


Background on the Bond Market

  Interview with Professor Steve Hall, co-author of 'The Death of the Left'. The Crispin Flintoff Show @thecrispinflintoffshow Analy...